تدقيق الجولة

لا توجد تناقضات مسجلة لهذه الجولة.

• {"Notes":"Group-IB cluster label is analytically useful but not conclusive operator identity.","Gap ID":"CY-GAP-014","Impact":"Blocks a single-actor/single-project attribution claim.","Status":"OPEN","Gap Type":"CLUSTER_OPERATOR_IDENTITY","Priority":"HIGH","Domain ID":"CY-DOM-001","Topic IDs":"CY-TOP-006,CY-DOM-008","Description":"Definitive common-operator proof across all seven CyberDakait families remains missing.","Last Reviewed":"2026-11-01","Resolution Run":"ACRIP-MFI-20261101-001","Required Evidence / Resolution":"Shared administrative artifacts, infrastructure ownership continuity, code provenance, operator handles or monetization-backend linkage across families."}
• {"Notes":"Shared fake-update/OTP/call-forwarding TTPs are insufficient for local attribution.","Gap ID":"CY-GAP-015","Impact":"Blocks local campaign/prevalence/attribution claims while preserving defensive relevance.","Status":"OPEN","Gap Type":"JORDAN_MENA_PROJECTION","Priority":"HIGH","Domain ID":"CY-DOM-001","Topic IDs":"CY-TOP-006,CY-TOP-001,CY-DOM-004","Description":"No direct Jordan/MENA victim telemetry, bank/provider logs, local IOC hits, transaction authorization-path evidence or authority attribution ties CyberDakait to the region.","Last Reviewed":"2026-11-01","Resolution Run":"ACRIP-MFI-20261101-001","Required Evidence / Resolution":"Jordan/MENA victim artifacts, provider/bank session and transaction logs, matched IOCs, authoritative incident reporting and cash-out evidence."}